jah609

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 47 minutes ago

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<So where's the lie?>>>>

The first sentence in the first paragraph.

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 10:24 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<If the talking points are so chock full of lies, pick a few, post them, and tell us all why the statement is false and how the administration knew it to be false. Should be easy if there are so many of [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 10:20 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<Let's try again. You mentioned the talking points. What in the talking points was a lie?>>>>

Against my better judgement, I'll give it one more try:

What relationship did the video have to the attack? Who [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 10:12 PM

Re: Oklahoma GOP's Disaster Aid Votes

<<<<Feel free to tell me why the GOP is not using Benghazi for political purposes but the left was using Newtown for such.>>>>

I must have missed something:

what was covered up in the Newtown [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 10:07 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<I believe you wanted a colon there, not a semi-colon, and that's not a phoenix, it's a zombie.>>>>

Arguably, a colon would have been more appropriate; if I were on your side, I think I'd rather deal with a Phoenix [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 9:08 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<XLife, it's like you haven't been listening or keeping up with news. It is a well known fact that the talking points were changed to the extent that none of it was true then and certainly now. Therefore, they were [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 9:03 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<I'll give you one clue: Talking Points.>>>>

<<<<Obviously, you don't know what "specific" means.>>>

I apologize; I am accustomed to dealing with adults, not those who need [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 5:20 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<Good. We're done with the operational stuff. Now we're just talking about the administration's spin afterwards.

What lies are you talking about? Be specific. A quote would be nice.>>>>

Obviously you [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 4:06 PM

Re: The reason the Republicans lose

It makes my head hurt when I try to reconcile the title of this post with the makeup of the HOUSE.

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 4:02 PM

Re: The reason the Republicans lose

<<<<We agree! (I suspect we would disagree about which ones were the nuts, though.)>>>>

We agree again!


(This could become tiresome).

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 3:48 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<Go ahead and answer the question if you can. What mistake did Obama, Clinton, Panetta or Dempsey make? (Or anyone else for that matter.) What would you have done differently? Be specific. Use [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 2:25 PM

Re: The reason the Republicans lose

<<<<As I said, this is not all or even most Republicans, just the nutty ones that are driving the party backwards.>>>>

Members of all political views have their share of nuts.

No further proof of that is [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 11:28 AM

Re: The reason the Republicans lose

<<<<Combine those with a disregard (or lack of education) for science ( climate science, evolution, even basic biology ), and you have the perfect storm of willful ignorance.>>>>

You win the prize for [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 11:04 AM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<Since there wasn't a crime committed, and since the death of the Americans did not seem to have occured as a result of any willful act or gross negligence on the part of the military, State Department or Administration, the cover-up, [more]

Boards Post

jah609 posted to the Political Asylum board. 10:41 AM

Congratulations, Apple!

For stiffing the taxpiggys.

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 5:02 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<<I don't know whether the CIA and the DoD handled this incident perfectly, but I do know they handled it well. Although four people were killed in the two separate attacks, dozens were rescued. As yet, no one has pointed to a [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 4:52 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<Obviously these scandals pale (deeply) in comparison to the Holocaust…>>>>

<<<<Seriously?

You think so?>>>>

Well, maybe not. As Hillary so famously said, "What [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 4:49 PM

Re: Benghazi! Benghazi!

<<<<<What does that even mean? Obama didn't cover up the Benghazi attack. He held a press conference the very next day to announce the deaths and condemn the terrorists.>>>>

"---the very next day-----he [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 5:59 PM

Re: Tea Party Groups Plan To Sue IRS

<<<What took them so long? In other words, why'd they wait until after this became a political "scandal" to sue? More importantly, what damages did they suffer? Just another publicity stunt.>>>

Publicity Stunt? Do [more]

Boards Post

jah609 replied to the Political Asylum board. 5:57 PM

Re: Lamest scheme ever

<<<Anyone know how many of the conservative groups in the IRS scandal had their applications rejected and were denied 501(c)(4) non-profit status?>>>

Anyone have any idea why this could be the issue?